New research suggests that 68 percent of the universe may not even be real. According to the results

According to the Lambda Cold Dark Matter (CDM) model, the currently accepted standard for the formation and evolution of the universe, the ordinary matter we encounter every day makes up only about 5% of the universe’s density. Twenty-seven percent of it, and the remaining 68 percent, consist of dark energy, which was previously the theoretical force driving the expansion of the universe. The Lambda CDM model is the current accepted standard for the origin and evolution of the universe.

However, a recent study, citing computer simulation results that revealed that given the ever-evolving structure of the universe, there should be theoretical holes in which dark energy actually forms should occur. It casts doubt on the existence of energy. I can’t explain the stuffing as it doesn’t exist anymore.

Einstein’s general theory of relativity, first published in 1915, serves as the basis for a general interpretation of the origin of the universe. This interpretation states that the Big Bang started the expansion of the universe about 13.8 billion years ago.

Because the equations that are used in practice are so extremely intricate, physicists have a tendency to simplify certain aspects of them in order to make them a little bit easier to deal with. When models are subsequently constructed from these reduced versions, even tiny flaws have the potential to snowball into enormous disparities.

“The equations in Einstein’s general theory of relativity that explain the expansion of the universe are so mathematically complex that in the last 100 years no solution has been found to explain the workings of cosmic structure.” From highly accurate supernova observations , we know this is changing. The universe is accelerating, but at the same time we rely on rough approximations of Einstein’s equations, which can lead to serious side effects such as the need for dark energy in models derived from those equations. be. ” [citation needed] Dr. Co-author of the new paper, Laszlo Dovos, said:

Dark energy cannot be directly researched since it has never been directly witnessed; instead, it can only be studied by the effects it has on other objects. Since there is no evidence to support either its features or its existence, it is only useful as a stopgap measure to fill in gaps in existing models.

In the 1990s, the discovery of type Ia supernovae was the basis for the first suggestion that unexplained forces could be responsible for the accelerating expansion of the universe.
These bright spots are known to glow at a constant peak intensity and are sometimes called “standard candles”. Astronomers can determine the distance to an object by measuring the brightness of the light emitted by the object as it arrives on Earth.

The scientists involved in this work were awarded the 2011 Nobel Prize in Physics for their contributions to the field of physics. This achievement played an important role in the widespread acceptance of the theory that dark energy is accelerating the expansion of the universe. However, other studies have cast doubt on the accuracy of this result, with some researchers suggesting a more accurate picture of the universe using software that could better handle the complexities of general relativity.