A type of Mycenaean sword from Hattusha: Evidence of technological exchange or military conflict in the Late Bronze Age?
admin
7 min read
The Late Bronze Age saw a flowering of cultural exchange and technological advancement throughout the ancient world. One of the most fascinating discoveries of this period was the discovery of Aegean-style swords in Anatolia. These extraordinary weapons not only reveal the artistic and artisanal secrets of ancient societies but also highlight the extent of commercial and cultural interaction in the ancient Mediterranean. Among the notable discoveries of Aegean-type swords is Hattuša, the ancient capital of the Hittite empire. This article explores the meaning of these swords and examines textual sources attesting to technological exchange during this era.
Aegean-Type Swords: Characteristics And Significance
Aegean-type swords are a distinct type of weapon that originated in the Aegean region, especially during the Late Bronze Age (c. 1600-1200 BCE). These swords are characterized by their distinctive hilt and blade design, making them easily recognizable. They typically have a straight blade, with two edges tapering to a point, making them effective in stabbing and cutting movements in combat. The handle usually has a prominent knob and guard, and is designed to be secure and comfortable to hold during use. The special grip at the end of the grip adds balance to the weapon and facilitates precise handling.Additionally, some swords have a guard, a crossbar between the’s hilt and the blade, which helps protect the wielder’s hand during combat, while the blade is often designed with a midrib, Helps reinforce the structure and improve the weapon’s durability.
Aegean-type swords were primarily made of bronze, a durable and valuable metal during the Bronze Age. Bronze represented a significant technological advancement at the time, and its widespread use in weaponry marked a transition from the previous Bronze Age.
The production of Aegean-type swords demonstrated a high level of metalworking skill and craftsmanship. The ability to cast, forge, and shape bronze into finely crafted weapons was a testament to the technological expertise of ancient societies. This knowledge was likely passed down through generations and shared through trade and cultural interactions.
The distribution of Aegean-type swords throughout the Aegean region and beyond indicates extensive trade and cultural contacts during the Late Bronze Age. The exchange of goods and ideas between different civilizations fostered a vibrant cultural milieu and likely played a crucial role in the advancement of various societies.
These swords were not merely weapons of war but also objects of prestige and diplomacy. The possession and display of finely crafted swords could serve as symbols of power, authority, and wealth for rulers and elite individuals. Additionally, Aegean-type swords might have been exchanged as diplomatic gifts between rulers of different regions, strengthening political alliances and diplomatic ties.
The design and characteristics of Aegean-type swords had a lasting impact on the development of later swords. As trade and cultural exchange continued over time, elements of these swords may have influenced the design of other weapons in different regions, highlighting the consequences Extensive technological exchange.
The appearance of Aegean-style swords in Anatolia, a region that includes modern-day Turkey, has attracted the interest of archaeologists and historians. The presence of these swords suggests a complex network of trade, cultural exchange or military conflict that linked the Aegean world with the civilizations of Anatolia.
The Aegean-Type Sword Found At Hattuša
Among the important discoveries of Aegean swords, Hattuša’s discovery is a notable example. Hattuša, located in central Anatolia, was the political and cultural center of the Hittite Empire during the Late Bronze Age. Two students operating in Hattuša, the capital of the Hittites, one of the largest empires of the time, discovered this sword by chance in 1991 without any other examples in the world.
The sword probably dates from the LHII period and is of Mycenaean origin, type B. The sword caused a stir when it was discovered and later offered to the gods by the Hittite king as an offering.
This bronze sword had an Akkadian inscription. It read:
“When the great king Tudhaliya destroyed the land of Assuwa, he offered this sword as an offering to his lord the storm god.””
After defeating the Assuwa Confederation, which encompassed the Lands of [L]ugga, Karakisa, Wilusiya, and Taruisa, Tudhaliya II probably devoted it to Hattuša.
The discovery of this Aegean-type sword in the heart of the Hittite Empire raised intriguing questions about the nature of interactions between the Hittites and other contemporary civilizations. It suggested that trade and cultural exchange were far more extensive and sophisticated than previously thought. The presence of the sword also hinted at possible diplomatic relations, alliances, or even military conflicts between the Hittites and the Aegean societies.
Further Mycenaean Finds In Anatolia: A Deeper Connection
In addition to the exciting discovery of this Aegean-type sword at Hattuša, other Mycenaean artifacts found in Anatolia further shed light on the close connection between these two ancient civilizations. A significant number of Mycenaean pottery fragments have been discovered in various places in Western Anatolia. These ceramic fragments, often decorated with distinctive designs, play an important role in attesting to the presence of Mycenaean influence in the region.
Two other Mycenaean-style swords were discovered in Izmir and Kastamonu/Kashtama, but they were most likely made in Anatolia. The proportion of tin in the copper alloy of the two swords has not yet been determined by analysis.
A Hittite-made ceramic bowl was also discovered at Hattuša, dating from the late 15th/early 14th century, with a depiction of a warrior wearing a boar’s ivory helmet with horns, crest and other symbols. floating ribbon. Since the Hittite helmet differs from Aegean depictions, what we have here may be a Hittite depiction of a Mycenaean warrior. There are also some Mycenaean finds at Masat Höyük. According to researchers, in Büyükkale near Hattuša, wall paintings in the Mycenaean style were also discovered.
The bowl was found at Boğazköy and is now in the Çorum Archaeological Museum.
The figure has been identified as a Mycenaean warrior based on his armor and sword. There are no known combat scenes in Hittite art, and the style is unusually dynamic, so the bowl may have been incised by a foreign artist.
Who was Tudhaliya ii?
Tudhaliya II was a Hittite king who ruled in the mid-14th century BC. He was the son of King Arnuwanda I and father of Suppiluliuma I. Records indicate that this occurred after the death of his father, I. Arnuwanda II. The Hittites experienced many rebellions and attacks during Tuthaliya’s reign.Therefore, Tudhaliya spent almost all his time waging war against enemies in various places and restoring the power of the Hittite state.
The Hittite state reaches the point of disintegration, the Kashkas in the north plunder Hattusha and from Kizilirmak advance south, Arzawa attacks from the west, Azzi and Isuwa attack from the east and the enemy reaches Kizzuwatna in the male as stated in a source written from Hattusili’s time.
The travel account of his son Suppiluliuma I is one of the most important documents containing information about Tudhaliya. When Hattusha was beyond Hittite control, partially preserved records show that Tudhaliya directed his expeditions from the city of Samuha. According to reports, he led several successful expeditions against the Kashkas, guiding a nine-tribe alliance at one point and a twelve-tribe alliance at another.
Written Sources On Technological Exchange In The Late Bronze Age
While archaeological finds provide tangible evidence of cultural exchange, written sources from this period offer invaluable insights into the complex dynamics of the diffusion process. technology. Among the most notable textual documents are the diplomatic archives discovered at Hattuša, which contain correspondence between Hittite kings and rulers of neighboring areas.
These clay tablets and inscriptions reveal a wealth of information about diplomatic relations, alliances, and trade agreements between the Hittites and their neighbors, including the Aegean civilization. References to the exchange of valuable goods, including weapons, adorn these panels, highlighting the importance of technology as a tool of diplomacy and international relations.
Additionally, the “Ahhiyawa text” found at Hattuša refers to the Ahhiyawans, a term believed to refer to the Mycenaean Greeks, who played an important role in the Late Bronze Age Mediterranean.These texts point to possible interactions between the Hittites and the Mycenaeans, reinforcing the idea of widespread cross-cultural contact at the time.
The discovery of Aegean-type swords in Anatolia, particularly the find at Hattuša, offers compelling evidence of the widespread trade and cultural exchange during the Late Bronze Age. These remarkable weapons not only exemplify the artistic achievements of ancient societies but also highlight the importance of technology as a means of diplomatic and economic engagement.
The written sources, including diplomatic archives and cuneiform tablets, further substantiate the existence of complex networks that facilitated the exchange of technology and ideas between the Hittites and their contemporaries in the Aegean region.
As archaeologists continue to uncover more evidence and scholars decipher additional written records, our understanding of this fascinating period in history will undoubtedly deepen, revealing the interconnectedness and interdependence of ancient civilizations in the Mediterranean world.
